marky No.1 wrote:Unfortunately less than 50% of the Membership bothered to vote. The Trust need a majority to move forward, so that's the end of that till the last kick of a ball.
The majority of those that did respond aren't in favour of a boycott.
Jason must be laughing his head off
Keith wrote:The Trust said;
"We are aware that due to high emotions at present, there are lots of opinions being given, especially in online forums. We've seen some 'false information' being stated as fact. If you are unsure of anything and want to check please do reach out"
Well, obviously, there is no "false information" on ShrimpsVoices, as the Trust don't read this forum. If they did read it, there would be no excuse for not engaging here, for example, to link to the questionnaire in the first place, or to rectify the "false information".
I agree, there isn't anything for the Trust to take from such a response. But, in that case, what can they do? Whittingham will continue to feed them BS, knowing they are toothless.
Business as usual next season. After all, it worked so well this season. And last season...![]()
![]()
[quote="Old Man Kensey"]Old Man Kensey wrote:As for a link to the poll, why would that be necessary? An email was sent directly to each member with the necessary link.
KenH wrote:Well, lots of trust members won't have provided an email address so won't have received the email link to the survey. Quite a lot of members are elderly and may not use the internet. Obviously, that doesn't matter when talking about online links to the poll on other SM channels. I'd like to have seen a statistic as to how many trust members have a valid email address as that may well change the picture as to the apparent apathy of a majority of trust members "not bothering" to vote, - as far as I know, there was no alternative way to vote other than the internet poll which obviously excludes those who aren't using smart phones/laptops, etc. Feel free to correct me if members without email were given an alternative method of voting?
twosheds wrote:I keep reading about the 1920 Union but I can't find anything on line about who they are? Is there a website where those of us that wish to find out more can visit? I'm not on Facebook or Twitter....
twosheds wrote:I keep reading about the 1920 Union but I can't find anything on line about who they are? Is there a website where those of us that wish to find out more can visit? I'm not on Facebook or Twitter....
Old Man Kensey wrote:Keith wrote:The Trust said;
"We are aware that due to high emotions at present, there are lots of opinions being given, especially in online forums. We've seen some 'false information' being stated as fact. If you are unsure of anything and want to check please do reach out"
Well, obviously, there is no "false information" on ShrimpsVoices, as the Trust don't read this forum.
I quite like the Trusts policy on Social Media. Stuff can soon go off thread and be misconstrued very easily. They are easy to contact via email and are usually very prompt in their responses.
As for a link to the poll, why would that be necessary? An email was sent directly to each member with the necessary link.
Keith wrote:
As it is, if the 'Not a Penny More' campaign isn't supported, or doesn't go ahead in significant numbers, what are fans going to do? What will 'The Trust' do? Carry on as before, but in the National League? National League North? North West Counties?
Old Man Kensey wrote:You can only hope that more people turn out and vote, without a mandate either way the Trust's hands are really tied. You'd also hope that anyone that isn't a member of the Trust signs up and get their voices heard.
They are quite a secretive group. That's understandable, if they want to arrange protests without Whittingham or the club knowing about it in advance, such as the posters in Whittingham's home area, such as his local Waitrose. But, that means unless involved, it isn't possible to know how many people are involved. In turn, that will make it impossible to arrange protests that involve a large group of fans.
But they have communicated.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 13 guests