Page 2 of 2

Re: John McMahon

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 10:29 pm
by Redalert1970
Right decision for all concerned

Re: John McMahon

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 5:18 pm
by John L
Redalert1970 wrote:The thing is John as been charged on 251 offences not just 1


That's nothing compared to this busy lad...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68255857

Re: John McMahon

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:22 pm
by redrobo
Redalert1970 wrote:Right decision for all concerned


Surely a temporary club suspension and 'gardening leave' until it's all sorted would have been sufficient at this stage rather than an immediate loss of employment..... :?: :?: :?:

Re: John McMahon

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 11:45 pm
by twosheds
    No...the club's integrity is far more important than any one individual...

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:20 am
    by Relapsed_Shrimp
    redrobo wrote:
    Redalert1970 wrote:Right decision for all concerned


    Surely a temporary club suspension and 'gardening leave' until it's all sorted would have been sufficient at this stage rather than an immediate loss of employment..... :?: :?: :?:


    Absolutely not. Face the fact someone at the club has done wrong. Get rid. Deserves everything he gets and needs erasing from the clubs history as backroom staff. The club is in a sensitive position and too delicate to mess around with experienced idiots who can't follow the rules. Makes you question everything he did and the decisions he was advising/made.

    Bye bye John. Shut the door in the way out - see you in Ladbrokes.

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:44 am
    by Gone_Shrimping
    The correct decision by the club.

    His case could drag on for months with Morecambe FC getting a mention every time which is not what we want when trying to find a buyer for the club.

    It is not just one isolated incident but 251 offences mentioned in the charge.

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:51 am
    by Billy bodger
    redrobo wrote:
    Redalert1970 wrote:Right decision for all concerned


    Surely a temporary club suspension and 'gardening leave' until it's all sorted would have been sufficient at this stage rather than an immediate loss of employment..... :?: :?: :?:


    No it was the right decision for him to go, the integrity of the Club has been brought into disrepute and we at this stage don’t know what matches he was betting on.

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 10:12 am
    by Redalert1970
    Sorry but John is not a young kid

    He must have known what he was doing was wrong

    Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 10:21 am
    by Gone_Shrimping
    Redalert1970 wrote:Sorry but John is not a young kid

    He must have known what he was doing was wrong

    Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this



    Well let's hope the players/former players didn't know.

    We don't know the nature of the bets but the only people who can affect football matches are players.

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 12:32 pm
    by Relapsed_Shrimp
    Gone_Shrimping wrote:
    Redalert1970 wrote:Sorry but John is not a young kid

    He must have known what he was doing was wrong

    Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this



    Well let's hope the players/former players didn't know.

    We don't know the nature of the bets but the only people who can affect football matches are players.


    Really? Only the players?

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 12:40 pm
    by Gone_Shrimping
    Relapsed_Shrimp wrote:
    Gone_Shrimping wrote:
    Redalert1970 wrote:Sorry but John is not a young kid

    He must have known what he was doing was wrong

    Only worry for me is how many other people at the club knew about this



    Well let's hope the players/former players didn't know.

    We don't know the nature of the bets but the only people who can affect football matches are players.


    Really? Only the players?


    As far as bets go , yes. The first yellow card , the first corner , the first throw in etc etc

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 12:50 pm
    by Relapsed_Shrimp
    Well let's hope the players/former players didn't know.

    We don't know the nature of the bets but the only people who can affect football matches are players.[/quote]

    Really? Only the players?[/quote]

    As far as bets go , yes. The first yellow card , the first corner , the first throw in etc etc[/quote]

    Argh yes, granted. However straight bets on winning and loosing is very much influenced by people in Johns role.

    Anyway he's gone and good riddance. The statement from the club was flattering. I wouldn't have bothered.

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 1:05 pm
    by Andy D
    lets not forget John has had chest pains recently and was off work with that, and it’s that what’s played a bigger part in his decision

    Re: John McMahon

    PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 1:15 pm
    by Keith
    While I do think the club parting ways with John, I hope that he isn't a problem gambler. Gambling addiction destroys lives and their families. Repeated gambling, simply because he didn't expect to get caught is one thing. Doing so due to addiction is completely different.